Is Universe Stargate’s version of Star Trek:Voyager?

When people compare Star­gate: Universe to other sci-fi show’s they talk about Battlestar Galac­tica. Usually nega­tively. The compar­i­son is an obvi­ous one because styl­is­ti­cally the two shows are very simi­lar. But there is another compar­i­son that doesn’t get made nearly as often. Star­gate: Universe has a lot in common with Star Trek Voyager.

The main cast of Universe. The series has a mu...
Stargate: Universe Cast - Image via Wikipedia

Take a look at the basic concept of both shows:

Lost in a differ­ent galaxy so far from home that they will likely never see Earth again. The ship’s crew must over­come distrust and antag­o­nisms to work together and survive.

That could describe either Star­gate: Universe or Star Trek: Voyager wouldn’t you say?

I’ve had this compar­i­son in the back of my mind ever since Star­gate: Universe first aired, but what brought it back to the surface was the recent news that for Season 2 of Universe the writ­ers plan to intro­duce a recur­ring villain. In itself that’s a good thing. One of the prob­lems with Universe so far has been the lack of a clearly defined enemy.

However, I have to ques­tion the use of the Lucian Alliance. The alliance were orig­i­nally intro­duced towards the end of SG-1’s run. The whole point of Universe was to move away from the famil­iar and explore new aliens, new soci­eties and new enemies. This was of course the exact same premise for Voyager too, and they also ended up intro­duc­ing some famil­iar faces.

There comes a point in any fran­chise where the unique­ness and orig­i­nal­ity has been mined out of the setting and desper­ate measure are taken to try and keep things going. I think most people would prob­a­bly point to Star Trek: Voyager as the moment that the Star Trek fran­chise began to founder. It was such a signif­i­cant cultural phenom­e­non that it kept going for years after that, but it grad­u­ally slid into obscu­rity.

Star­gate, despite it’s longevity, has not had nearly the social impact that Star Trek did and I have to wonder how quickly the Star­gate fran­chise could fade if they continue to make the same mistakes that Star Trek did.

Of course fran­chises can be resur­rected. Look at the phenom­e­nal success of the recent Star Trek movie. But in that case it took a full reboot to undo a decade’s worth of damage and I don’t think Star­gate has that luxury.

What do you think? Will Star­gate: Universe survive beyond the second season? Is there some way to reju­ve­nate the fran­chise with out a full reboot? How would you fix it?

About Eoghann Irving

Overly opinionated owner and author of eoghann.com. You can get updated on his posts directly on the blog here or through the usual social networking suspects. What? You expected me to say something interesting here? That's what the blog posts are for. Eoghann has often wondered if people read these little bio things we have to fill out everywhere on the internet and, assuming they do, why?

Comments

  • I had thought of Star­gate Universe as their version of Star Trek Voyager from day one. They had a simi­lar theme with the Civil­ians vs Mili­tary as Feder­a­tion vs Maquis. However that thought became even more forti­fied with the intro­duc­tion of the Lucian Alliance. Now it is even a better compar­i­son. Earth Crew vs Lucian Alliance Crew. I however don’t think we will see the same chem­istry as Janeway and Chako­tay.

    Battlestar was so differ­ent that I never felt a compar­i­son with Voyager, except for the compar­isons and contrasts with the orig­i­nal Battlestar series. 

Comments are closed.

Respond